Main Page

Welcome to the wikipages!
The Stable State is an evolving ruleset for people aiming at living together peacefully, respectfully and true. It is a very pure form of democracy. It is our hope that some day real communities and states will be organised according to this ruleset and, thus, become real Stable States. The entire world could be organised as 1 Stable State, so it is even a project to politically achieve what commercially, communication- and travel-wise is already a reality - we are one world.

The stable state is based on 3 ideals and laws:


 *  Truth 
 *  Respect 
 *  Peace 

which we think all people of all religions (or non-religions) and races can and must commit themselves to. Within these laws, we believe in the freedom of everybody to achieve a happy and prosperous life. Also, these laws never change, they cannot be changed. A Stable State's constitution, hence, is very simple "The state of XY is the people in its confines. It persues truth, respect and peace among the people, the nature and visitors. XY is true, respectful and peaceful towards its neigbour states and all states of this world. It assures to never attack or occupy land outside its confines and is open to peacefully and democratically merge with other Stable States."

All the organisational and processual details to achieve these ideals are defined with so called rules.

2022-05-31: Continued military actions of Russia in Ukraine
Still, Russia does massive military actions on Ukraine territory. Also, it continues to officially tell untrue claims like Ukraine is nazi-ruled or there was genozide done in Donbass or that NATO is a threat for Russia.

We believe that the UN must have rules in place that automatically suspend all active participation rights of states in the security council, in the UN plenary and other committees if


 * they do not commit to published confines according to rule SC.03 Define the confines and or are currently violating them by military actions outside their territory

and/or


 * they make untrue official statements

And the truth/non-truth is revealed with the truth challing process of SCS.02 Truth Challenging.

2022-03-12: Military actions of Russia in Ukraine
Since 2 weeks, Russia does massive military actions on Ukraine territory. Also, Russia claims that parts of Ukraine belong to Russia and/or to 'independent new states'. Russia claims to bring peace to Ukraine. This is a blatant breach of international law and must be punished. What should be the correct process? Step by step:

(1) Russia claims that Nato is a threat to Russia. But Nato is a defense alliance. Nato must submit a request to Russia that 'Nato will never attack Russia and Russia acknowledges this'. If Russia fails to acknowledge this, it must quit the UN and UN security council.

(2) Russia claims that Krim belongs to Russia. Ukraine can accept this or fight. If there is no fight for 5 years, then Ukraine cannot claim Krim back. Confer to Stable State rule SC.03.5 (and rule SC.03.8).

(3) Russia claims that in Donbass (Luhansk and Donezk) the Ukraine did genocide on Russians. For such things (and others), we'd need a new instrument of neutral and correct reporting/investigations: UN reporters. They must be granted access to all regions and locations and are required to report what they see and get evidence for. If a country does not grant access, it is automatically expelled from the UN and all its organisations. Maybe 3 independent UN reporting organisations must be established to assure double verifiable reports (if only 2 and they report differently, one cannot tell what is correct. if 3 and 2 report consistently then, with low rest likelyhood of error, this is the correct report). This UN reporters can (must) also be present at votings, justice processes, etc. in 'questionable' countries.

So, we cannot tell if this is true or not. But for sure we can tell that it is not Russia that is allowed to claim this. Russia must put this claim to the UN and UN reports/verifies. And if Ukraine does not grant access, then the claim is automatically true. Else, the UN reporters will report neutrally on the Donbass situation. And the claim is either verified or falsified. But all by UN, not Russia.

(4) Russia acknowledges 2 independent new states, Luhansk and Donezk, both on Ukraine territory. Again, this is not valid. Only the UN can accept new states. But they must first be democratically decided according to rule SC.06.2. And this democratic process reported by the UN reporters.

(5) Russia enters Ukraine with military forces. This is an invasion as per rule SC.03.8 and must be fought with all means by Ukraine military forces. Other states should help Ukraine, because the law violator is Russia. If Russia gets away with this, then the entire international law and law enforcement must be trashed. And the good states must stand together and be military-wise stronger than the bad states. This is not what we want. But if there is a foul player he must be forced by all others to quit the game and not take over the overall ruling.

By the way: the veto rights in the UN security commission is a joke and must be abolished. Or the UN security commission dissolved as it is now. Completely useless in our opinion.

Questions and answers:

Q: How to get out of a dictatorship like Russia and transform this land and its people into a democracy like the stable state?

A: Again, the UN reporters can help. If not welcome in a country, then this country is automatically and immediately expelled from the UN. The UN is the world-wide assembly of democratic 'good' states. Actually, Putin, unfortunately, is just a simple mafioso and criminal mind. But he has nuclear weapons in his hands and terrorises the world with it. The only way out is to wait until Putin dies or otherwise looses his command power over nuclear weapons. We do not think that Russia or the Russian people are bad - not at all. But Russia must free itself from mafia, corruption and violence. Convert to a true democracy with self-confident, mature, educated and defensible citizens. Not be sheep-like humans that fear the armed mafiosos and its boss, Putin.

The same is likely true for some other mafioso states (Belarus, North Corea, ...) and also other corrupt states.

 Archive of news and discussions 

Rules
With all people fully understanding the 3 laws and adhering to them in their thoughts and deeds, no further rules would be necessary to achieve stable and prosperous communities (as prosperous as nature's forces allow). But the reality shows that, first, not all people equally understand and, second, adhere to these laws. Hence, some rules are in need according to which states, i.e. people living together, are organised.

Rules encompass (a) the meta-rules, (b) definitions (contained in our glossary), (c) parameters and (d) regulations grouped in the 7 domains of:


 * 1)  Constitution 
 * 2)  Persons Administration 
 * 3)  Science, Culture and Sports (Education) 
 * 4)  Inner Security (Police) 
 * 5)  Justice 
 * 6)  Exterior Security (Army) 
 * 7)  Finances 

In contrast to the 3 ideals and laws, the rules are subject to change and optimization towards achieving the ideals. Rules are defined, modified and removed by democratic processes that must involve all citizens. There are no elections in which the legislative power can be delegated. Also, each rule must fulfill the meta-rules.

State Design Principles
The state is defined as people geographically living together. While each person has the right to travel and move, still, at a given point in time, each has its home at a defined geographical location (somewhere). This means that we are geographcally forced to live and deal with other people; the closest, i.e. in the same home, hopefully carefully self-chosen and most others, our neighbours, are more or less not self-chosen. Within these people, we distinguish between (1) the permanent residents that are grown-up, i.e. the citizens, (2) the visitors and (3) many more persons-categories before, in-between and around (1) and (2).

A state is the set of persons living geographically together and the definition of this geographic space (i.e. the so called 'confines') and the mandatory interactions (events and actions) to get organised towards the ideals and laws of truth, respect and peace.

Freedom and self-responsibility: We believe that state interactions should be minimised and the freedom and self-responsibility of each person should be maximised.

Assured equal rights and minimal standard of living: While freedom and self-responsibility of each person should be maximised, it is of utmost importance that equal rights and a community-defined minimal standard of living for all persons must be assured. The minimal standard of living must take the available natural ressources as well as human-made and maintained systems into account.

Visitors are not citizens: Visitors (short-time immigrants) are very welcome with fair but reduced rights compared to the ones of the citizens.

Permanent immigrants have the right to become citizens: If visitors become permanent immigrants, they shall be given the opportunity and under some conditions be forced to become full citizens; the definition of 'permanent' again in the realm of the community.

The Agile State
Stable State basic decisions (elections and votes) are agile i.e. not delayable and taken at a given pace, the so-called state-cycles. Also, they are taken involving each community member equally. Hence, the Stable State is also known as Agile State and Agile Democracy. Also, the state's "event handling", i.e. the state's officials and/or automated devices acting according to the laws and rules is always timed. There must be NO options to "play games" with delaying actions or decisions.

wikihelp