Persons administration: Difference between revisions
→P.04 Partnerships (marriages, best friendships) and splits (divorces)
Line 141:
''We think this, having just educated and professional full citizens, is necessary if a real democracy shall work. Each member of the democracy must understand processes and dependencies in order to contribute to making good and independent decisions. This is what we want and need. Not a herd of sheep senselessly running behind a 'lead ram' or be intimidated by 'dogs or wolves'.''
==== P.04 Partnerships (marriages, best friendships) and splits (divorces) ====
P.04.1 What a partnership non-financially implies
You want the best for your partner. If you'd be forced to sacrifice yourself for your partner (which is a very though formulation - and hopefully rare situation in reality), your decision should tend to 'yes, I'd sacrifice myself for my partner'. In the real such situation, you might decide for 'no', but in less tough situations, the decision must be 'yes'.
In case your partner becomes invalid to make decisions, you take over all rights and duties for him/her.
Line 149:
You may always visit your partner in a hospital - as far as medical indications allow it.
This replaces the relatives respective rights and duties: parents to children (own or adopted) and vice versa, siblings to each other, uncles/aunts to nephews/nieces and vice versa, in this sequence of precedence.
If you have no
P.04.2 What a partnership financially implies
P.04.2 Qualifying to partner▼
Each keeps the individually owned accounts and assets/contracts.
Only full citizens that are so for at least 3 years can decide to partner if not related.▼
You open a common savings account and each specifies his/her monthly contribution to it with a fixed amount or formula or regulation that makes it clear each month how much is to be paid. This can only be used with ''both'' agreeing. And this is inherited. From this you may pay for a commonly owned house or company share or ... The contribution may be 0.
You open a common current expenses account onto which both have individual usage rights. Else it is like the savings account.
You may also define financial or assets transfers individual to individual prior to or while running a partnership as part of the partnership contract. Not for afterwards. No ugly splits/divorces shall happen.
All payments are made on the first day of the month. (And the regulations must be made so that on the first day of each month the exact amounts/assets to be transferred are defined)
The status after divorce is again unmarried.▼
P.04.4 Types of partnerships
(a) '''Partnership''' between male and female is the most common type. It has, by definition, the sexual component, maybe to have children and always to be the partner's sexual fulfillment. Of course, this only without violence, but for sex (normal, oral, manual) both partnered always say 'yes'. Partners vow sexual faithfulness and saying 'no' is also sexual unfaithfulness. Partnership, however, is not restricted to male and female.
(b) '''Non-exclusive partnership''': this can have the form of allowing one or both partners to have sex with others. Or even the form of allowing one or both partners to have other, additional, partnerships, either just best-friendships or any partnership.
(c) '''Marriage''': One of your partnerships (not best-friendships) in the course of your lifetime, you and your partner may decide, right at the beginning or while running it, to call marriage. But when splitting it or rename back to partnership or convert to best-friendship - this was it.
(d) '''Best-friendship''': this is a partnership without the sexual component and it is by default non-exclusive. Can be made so as an option.
P.04.5 Declaring the partnership
Both do so at the secretary couple. The financial details are not public, the type of partnership is, except if exclusive or not.
And existing partnerships can be changed on the 2nd of a month or later in the month by end of the month (or rather by start of the new month) by any individual, only the own financial obligations and type, or by both at the secretary couple. If not by both, the secretary couple must immediately inform the other individual of the changes.
P.04.6 Splitting (divorcing)
On the 2nd of a month or later in the month, you may split. Both individuals can do this - no need for both agreeing, no need for giving reasons. The split is immediately effective. In the case of a marriage, the split is called divorce.
P.04.7 Overpopulation mode - licences to have children for marriages
Line 193 ⟶ 199:
We assume 50'000'000 km2 of earth land surface to be inhabitable. So the average ratio is 20 human beings per km2 (parameter). The average life duration is 80 years (parameter). So, we can have 20 / 80 = 1/4 child licences per km2 per year for the entire state. Each month the secretaries state-wide can issue 1/12th of the annual state-wide child licenses to marriages that apply for it.
The licenses are issued to marriages with priority (1) by region of yet lowest density of population, (2) number of children lower than 3 (yes has higher prio than no), (3) time of application state-wide. When there are more applications than licenses available, then the
Yes, you read right, it is '''marriages''', not any partnerships, that get this right.
'''''Comments on P.04 Marriages and divorces'''''▼
''We think that it is important to be full citizen and at least for some time living as full citizen before one enters into a marriage. Also, this prevents children from going directly from childhood and possibly at a very early age into marriage.''▼
▲''We think that it is important to be full citizen and at least for some time living as full citizen before one enters into a
''Then, only married people can legally get children in the overpopulation mode. This mode may look strange to some readers. But it is the stablestate's proposed regulation to prevent an overpopulation of human beings on this planet ; in the end to prevent the cruel and negative consequences such an overpopulation has. There may be different and smarter regulations proposed and accepted - but having no regulation is not honest, not correct, not intelligent.''
Yes, and this sexual component, seems to be
====P.05 Manage superannuation====
|