Science, Culture and Sports: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 40:
Except from SCS.01.01 if clearly declared as 'fiction'.
 
SCS.01.0203 No anonymous publications
 
Each publication must have the author(s), location (a basic community) and date(time) indicated. Anonymous publications are destroyed (by [[Inner security|Inner Security)]].
 
SCS.01.04 Publication ID and versions
Line 48:
Each publication must have a stem ID (= fixed URL) that remains the same on updates. Old versions and planned revisions must be published using the stem ID and a version ID. The current release is accessible with just the stem ID.
 
==== SCS.02 Official '''Knowledge''' ====
SCS.01.02 '''Knowledge''' is published / updated by the educators and committees on the specific URL 'knowledge.<country-tld>'. It can (must) be used as reference as well as teaching material for the respective knowledge categories. Before publication it undergoes a verification and validation process by the committee of each of the knowledge categories and industries and research domains. Therefore, the quality of the content of www.knowledge.<tls> can be assumed to be high. Still, each published statement anytime can be challenged
SCS.02.01 Official knowledge publication
 
Knowledge is published / updated by the educators and committees on the specific URL 'knowledge.<country-tld>'. It can (must) be used as reference as well as teaching material for the respective knowledge categories.
'''SCS.02 Truth challenging process'''
 
SCS.02.02 Verification and validation
SCS.02.01 Each statement of a non-knowledge or basic knowledge publication can be challenged ''by any citizen'' at the educator where the publication was made. The challenge must (1) cite the statement or statements of the publication as '''original''', then (2) propose the '''correction''' (which can be deleting, adding or changing statments with change highlighting) and (3) '''provide evidence''' and/or the rationale for the change. The educator checks the formal validity of those 3 elements within 1 hour. (On disagreements, this can be raised by the challenger)
 
SCS.01.02 '''Knowledge''' is published / updated by the educators and committees on the specific URL 'knowledge.<country-tld>'. It can (must) be used as reference as well as teaching material for the respective knowledge categories. Before publication it undergoes a verification and validation process by the committee of each of the knowledge categories and industries and research domains. Therefore, the quality of the content of www.knowledge.<tls> can be assumed to be high. Still, each published statement anytime can be challenged
SCS.02.02 5 days before the next community assembly this challenge, if formally correct, is published in the community. (And if the challenge was submitted too close to this deadline, then the overnext sommunity assembly will be the one)
 
'''SCS.0203 Truth challenging process'''
SCS.02.03 At the next community assembly, depending on the nature of the challenge, the evidence must be produced/demonstrated by the challenger on the spot. Also, the challenge is presented in a max. 5 minutes talk by the challenger. And the authors may defend the original, optionally also with evidence demonstrations, in another max. 5 minutes. Or the authors may support the challenge. Then, there will be a vote on the challenge.
 
SCS.03.01 Where to place the challenge for publications and basic official knoweldge
SCS.02.04 Higher-order knowledge categories publications can be challenged and voted only by respective exam absolvents. The community level where those challenges are treated are such that at least 20 or the total of respective exam absolvents can vote on it.
 
Each statement of a non-knowledge or official basic knowledge publication can be challenged ''by any citizen'' at the educator couple of the basic community where the publication was made.
 
SCS.03.02 The challenge
 
SCS.02.01 Each statement of a non-knowledge or basic knowledge publication can be challenged ''by any citizen'' at the educator where the publication was made. The challenge must (1) cite the statement or statements of the publication as '''original''', then (2) propose the '''correction''' (which can be deleting, adding or changing statments with change highlighting) and (3) '''provide evidence''' and/or the rationale for the change. The educator checks the formal validity of those 3 elements within 1 hour. (On disagreements, this can be raised by the challenger)
 
SCS.03.03 Formal check
 
The educator couple checks the formal validity of those 3 elements within 1 hour. (On disagreements, this can be raised by the challenger)
 
SCS.03.04 Challenge publication
 
SCS.02.02 5 days before the next community assembly this challenge, if formally correct, is published in the community. (And if the challenge was submitted too close to this deadline, then the overnext sommunity assembly will be the one)
 
SCS.03.05 Challenge presentation, original defense
 
SCS.02.03 At the next community assembly, depending on the nature of the challenge, the evidence must be produced/demonstrated by the challenger on the spot. Also, the challenge is presented in a max. 5 minutes talk by the challenger. And the authors may defend the original, optionally also with evidence demonstrations, in another max. 5 minutes. Or the authors may support the challenge. Then, there will be a vote on the challenge.
 
SCS.03.06 Vote
 
Then, there will be a vote on the challenge according to C.09.6 Basic democratic decisions (cf. [[Constitution]]).
 
SCS.03.07 Where to place the challenge for higher-order official knoweldge
 
SCS.02.04 Higher-order knowledge categories publications can be challenged and voted only by respective exam absolvents. The community level where those challenges are placed and treated are such that at least 20 or the total of respective exam absolvents of the entire state can vote on it. The educator couple of the basic community where the publication has been made, tells the challenger where to place his/her challenge. Else, the process is as for normal challenges, except with the filter on voters (just exam absolvents of the higher-order domain/industry/profession).
 
# Science: Collect and publish knowledge (non-person related facts, statistics, mathematical definitions and proofed theorems, non-falsified theories in any field, practical knowledge of any profession, practical knowledge for 'households' (buying, cleaning, nutrition, waste disposal, home gardening, transport, ...) . Only the community approved knowledge base is the one to take into account for community decisions. This knowledge is categorised into:
Bureaucrats, stablestateusers, Administrators
388

edits